>
"Gee, it had been a long time. I hadn’t realized that being in that library for so many years was almost like being in some kind of timeless thing. Maybe an airplane of books, flying through the pages of eternity."
— Richard Brautigan, The Abortion.
To the guy at McNally Jackson whose preferred use of my time was to argue with me that non-fiction is categorically more important and more life-changing than fiction: let me respond, now that my hangover has ebbed to a less threatening level, with as huge a generalization. Non-fiction tells you what to think, and how. Fiction gives you something to think about. Also, I remembered what is the best book about atheism, and it’s not by Richard Dawkins. It’s by Hemingway. Byeeeeeee.
When Tom Brokaw asks “are you optimistic about the future?” and Joan Didion says “the future… of…” without fully enunciating a question mark it is exactly how I feel.

I have never written a proper book review. For one thing, I haven’t been asked. For the second, I find it trickiest to write about writing. Dancing about architecture makes more sense than dancing about dancing, I think. I’m not saying I will never review a book. David Balzer’s book, though, which I just finished in its beautiful .pdf entirety, will not be the first.
This is cos I adore David. I’ve written about a lot of people I adore, but those are people who do things I can’t and don’t do; this would be different, too obvious, too make-lovey. There are times his book—it is a book of short stories and it’s titled, adequately, Contrivances—makes me envious. There are times it makes me uncomfortable. These are not good feelings but they’re good compliments.
Once, in the summer just past, David and I went to the island. It was a weekday and the two of us. I remember what I wore because I bought it that day (a wide-striped tent of a dress, made to float) and because he liked it. I remember our conversations eidetically. We talked and read and talked; we were surprised by some clandestine similarities. He told me about his childhood and about his book. It seemed the second one wouldn’t exist without the first; is that true for all writers? For all first books? It’s so thrilling to me that he has this first book, which you can and should order today, and that he is proud of it, which he can and should be.
David’s writing doesn’t feel “natural” or “effortless.” I don’t prize effortlessness, you should know. As an art critic, he’s formal and rigorous and sophisticated, and this book, which comprises many lessons about why we have art (to protect us from each other, is one answer), is no less so. It’s richer though, and funny. It’s needle-pointy. It’s full of startling flesh. He is not afraid to get strange in the greater interest of making something true. (Also, his reference library, I MEAN: “Old Hollywood, Gothic novels, art-world gossip, and maybe a Lifetime movie or two…”)
David writes, I think, like he’s painting in a great tradition. You can see the individual strokes, the painstaking word choices, the small wrought movements, and it’s so descriptive that you think you see all there is to see. You don’t really understand what you don’t see until you step back from the whole thing and sigh.
P.S. David, we need to talk about The Abortion.
LIT |
>
"I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see, and what it means."
— Joan Didion (via invisiblestories)
(Source: invisiblestories)
Reblogged from youth on a rampage.
This is reeeally the thing to illustrate my decade-overdue reading of Nightwood, a queer sweet fever dream of a novel that everybody who read it and who knew me told me I would love.
(Source: thevintagepornconnoisseursclub)
Reblogged from nickdrake™.
On Patti Smith, Briefly
My best friend flew in from Paris and we went to see Patti Smith at Housing Works and now I regret every other time I said something was “perfect” because those times were shit, comparatively. Patti Smith has one of those inseparable names. To say just Patti is practically sacrilege and to say Smith means nothing. It’s true I can’t think of a better Smith, but still. Patti Smith makes everything make sense for me. She is a rare person who did not become a woman, not in the de Beauvoirian way, not in the Butlerian way, and she is the exception to my rule that no interesting person is unpretentious. Or perhaps it is that she so fully and wholly and fucking admirably believes in her pretentions, in the things that save her from a world that probably doesn’t… deserve her.
I love her too much. Like Didion, like Francesca Woodman, who Patti Smith referenced in a heartstoppingly casual way.
She said that when she wrote music she wanted everyone to hear it, to love it. She was very against the kinds of idiots who said she sold out when she showed up on Billboard or whatever. But she said also that when she wrote, she wrote of her own concerns; it did not matter whether anyone would read, say, her poetry. Well I guess no one reads poetry at all you could say. But I think there’s something else to be drawn from this distinction; I just wish I knew what it was. I could work much better, I think.
A lonely Fitzgerald wrote this card to himself
Sometimes I think I won’t write a book I will just write a long series of postcards that will slowly approach bookness.
Reblogged from The Olympia Press.
List of Books I Had a Panic Attack About Leaving Behind and Am Making My Friend Sarah Bring to Me Now
Daphne DuMaurier, Rebecca.
Gertrude Stein, Ida.
Patti Smith, Just Kids.
Lorrie Moore, Self Help.
Carson McCullers, The Heart is a Lonely Hunter.
Vladimir Nabokov, Lolita.
F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby.
Joan Didion, Play It as It Lays; Democracy; The White Album.
Milan Kundera, Laughter and Forgetting.
Also I bought new fancy editions of This Side of Paradise and All The Pretty Horses, which I’ve never read, and Wuthering Heights duh.
UPDATE FOR MY TWO REALLY CONCERNED FRIENDS: I did not “forget” these books; I put them in a box and left them at the old apartment and then ran out of time and room in suitcases. They will be with me soon. Breathe easy.
Joan Didion talks about gaining confidence, and about her husband, the writer John Gregory Dunne. Next week, the entire interview will be published on The Believer website. Excerpt 1, and Excerpt 2 are here. We spoke over the phone, she from her hotel in Washington, on book tour for Blue Nights.
— Sheila Heti
BLVR: I imagine it’s difficult to write non-fiction because you have to have such authority to say, This is what the world is. How can you really have the authority to say, I know enough and I’ve seen enough to be able to conclude things about the world?
JD: Well, you have to just gain that confidence, which is part of what you do over the course of your whole career. I mean, you become confident that you have—this sounds ridiculous, but you become confident that you have the answer.
BLVR: Do you remember the point—
JD: —at which you get that confidence?
BLVR: Well, for you.
JD: For me it probably occurred fairly late, when I started getting feedback from the audience. Feedback in terms of a response. Well, it wasn’t fairly late. It was fairly early [laughs] when I started getting a response from the audience, otherwise I wouldn’t have had the nerve to continue.
BLVR: Where would you situate that? Around which book?
JD: I would say it happened at Play It As It Lays. Which was, when? My third book. I remember my husband saying, when Play It As It Lays was about to come out, he said, This isn’t going to—you’re never going to—you’re never going to—this book isn’t going to make it.
BLVR: Did it hurt your feelings when he said that?
JD: No, it didn’t hurt my feelings. It was, I thought, a realistic assessment, which I certainly agreed with.
BLVR: Why did you both feel like it wasn’t going to make it?
JD: Because it was my third book and I had not made it until then. And you don’t see—I mean, you don’t think in terms of suddenly making it. You think you have some stable talent which will show no matter what you’re writing, and if it doesn’t seem to be getting across to the audience once, you can’t imagine that moment when it suddenly will.
I really like Sheila Heti and I really think I love Joan Didion.
Reblogged from The Believer Logger.



![believermag:
Joan Didion talks about gaining confidence, and about her husband, the writer John Gregory Dunne. Next week, the entire interview will be published on The Believer website. Excerpt 1, and Excerpt 2 are here. We spoke over the phone, she from her hotel in Washington, on book tour for Blue Nights.
— Sheila Heti
BLVR: I imagine it’s difficult to write non-fiction because you have to have such authority to say, This is what the world is. How can you really have the authority to say, I know enough and I’ve seen enough to be able to conclude things about the world?
JD: Well, you have to just gain that confidence, which is part of what you do over the course of your whole career. I mean, you become confident that you have—this sounds ridiculous, but you become confident that you have the answer.
BLVR: Do you remember the point—
JD: —at which you get that confidence?
BLVR: Well, for you.
JD: For me it probably occurred fairly late, when I started getting feedback from the audience. Feedback in terms of a response. Well, it wasn’t fairly late. It was fairly early [laughs] when I started getting a response from the audience, otherwise I wouldn’t have had the nerve to continue.
BLVR: Where would you situate that? Around which book?
JD: I would say it happened at Play It As It Lays. Which was, when? My third book. I remember my husband saying, when Play It As It Lays was about to come out, he said, This isn’t going to—you’re never going to—you’re never going to—this book isn’t going to make it.
BLVR: Did it hurt your feelings when he said that?
JD: No, it didn’t hurt my feelings. It was, I thought, a realistic assessment, which I certainly agreed with.
BLVR: Why did you both feel like it wasn’t going to make it?
JD: Because it was my third book and I had not made it until then. And you don’t see—I mean, you don’t think in terms of suddenly making it. You think you have some stable talent which will show no matter what you’re writing, and if it doesn’t seem to be getting across to the audience once, you can’t imagine that moment when it suddenly will.
I really like Sheila Heti and I really think I love Joan Didion.](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly2gmdkDl21qzh8wko1_r3_400.jpg)